Batir Wardam Blog
Blogging about media, science, development, culture and future trends from the perspectives of a Jordanian liberal observer.

How to achieve conflict resolution in the Jordanian blogsphere

It seems that the recent problem emerging from the removal of three blogs from Jordan Blogs aggregator is out of proprtions now and there are grave consequences. It is bad to write something like a UN statement but we are in a need of conflict resolution in the Jordanian blogsphere.
Such a problem may have been destined to occure at some time. There is no "command and control" of the Jordanian blogsphere and that is the most remarkable added value of blogs. The idea that a blogsphere will organize itself, like a market may be naive and some principles should be applied.
We are a group of bloggers with diverse opinions, styles, objectives and feelings. We all share the love for writing and expressing ourselves. Beyond that we can be as diverse as a tropical rainforest. The only thread that will keep us integrated is a mutual respect to each other and to the "virtual institutions" that emerge.
Talking about institutions the only organized system here is to establish "aggregators" which are services done by bloggers themselves to keep all other bloggers united in a one-stop shop of blogs. When Jordan Planet was frozen we all felt the pain. I am sure each one of us felt a drop in hits and quality of comments and participation. We were all in desperate need for a new "home" for all of us.
Khaled did a wonderful job, out of his own time to establish Jordan blogs by bringing together all the blogs that were enlisted in Jordan Planet and then added more gradually. Jordan Blogs became our home and then Qwaider brilliantly set up another aggregator with that included Arab flavour with some Arab blogs that were not selected in Toot. Other aggregators including Sawtona provided more blogs and the Jordanian blogsphere was almost complete with the three sites.
At this stage let me emphasize few points:
1- Jordan Blogs is a service provided kindly by Khaled from his own time. He has been assisted by a committee of bloggers later to manage the site. He should be thanked and not attacked.
2- Jordan Blogs is not a governemnt and Khaled is not a dictator. He is a devoted person who wanted to bring Jordanian bloggers together voluntarily. However, Khaled and the committee have de facto rights to manage since they have volunteered.
3- The issues of the three removed blogs was eventual to arise. Maybe not with the three in particular but with others. At any point of time someone in JB committee will feel that some blogs are sending messages that are not "responsible".
4- So, who decides responsibility and who has the right to evaluate? In the theoritical point of view Khaled and committee will have only their opinions but at the end they do manage a site that is liable. Some decisions have to be taken.
5- The controversial content was related to harsh criticism to the Jordanian regime-sometimes with a hatred feeling- and opening up porn links. The regime criticism can be liable by law, while the porn issue is more linked with standard moral values. Does Khaled and the committee have the right to delete the blogs?
 
My own idea is that JB can be managed in a more democratic way by engaging the stakeholders (bloggers) and making them share responsibility. So, if Khaled thinks that certain blogs are offensive or maybe causing legal liability to the aggregator a small poll can be placed to ask the population of JB to vote for keeping the certain blogs or not. In case that the vote was in favour of "yes" all bloggers should bear the responsibility and if they said "no" then a joint decision has to be respected.
 
This is beyond us now but it can be used in future cases.
 
In the meantime I am very worried about Khaled's last statement. Oviously he is hurt-rightly so- with an unjustified campaign against him. He is disappointed and would love nothing like leaving all this and focusing on his studies. In this case we should all feel and say that Jordan Blogs is our home and we want it to be alive. Some bloggers are angry but the majority are supportive of Khaled and want JB to remian. In this case we should not let Khaled carry the responsibility alone. I have the following ideas:
1- Elect a 7 members management committee with Khaled as head.
2- Develop a code of conduct to JB that every blogger should accept and adhere to. It should be clear and if anyone has problems-including myself- can carry his/her blog to another aggregator.
3- If a blogger violates the code of conduct he/she should be notified with the violation and asked to remove the offensive post.
 
A new Ministry of blogsphere control? No. Just a group of bloggers who want to be in one place and manage this home in a democratic way.
I would love to hear some feedback here.


Bookmark this post: KhabberDel.ici.ousDiggRedditY! MyWebGoogle Bookmarks
(11) comments


Add a Comment

On February, 24, 2007 1:50 AM , hamede
from United States said:

Khaled did a good job,thank you khaled.
(unjustified campaign)my stand with the guys based on if you want to call something with the name jordan it have to include evry one,or call it by your name,i am not mad at any one this is my opinion,call that unjustified campaign is unacceptable.


On February, 24, 2007 2:03 AM , Hashmi Hashmi said:

Again, was JB and other aggregators (sawtona and dwwenn) subjected to external pressure (internal spying devices) to remove blogs that tried to bring attention to the prominent issue of the autocracy of the royal regime in Jordan. THAT IS THE MAIN qestion.


On February, 24, 2007 2:23 AM , 7aki Fadi
from Canada said:

Hi Batir,
Can you help me spread the word.

http://7aki-fadi.blogspot.com/2007/02/nominate-best-five-jordanians.html


On February, 24, 2007 5:57 AM , Nas
from Jordan said:

yes, these two blogs if left unmonitored will lead to the downfall of the monarchy. the conspiracy was massive.

batir: <a href="http://www.black-iris.com/2007/02/15/jordan-blogs-censorship-tasty-solutions/">my solutions</a> were better...at least they included the possibility of ice cream


On February, 24, 2007 6:06 AM , cute mona
from United States said:

Thats cool


On February, 24, 2007 9:51 AM , kinzi said:

Well stated, Batir. I would like the ice cream part, too,though. :D


On February, 24, 2007 9:52 AM , kinzi said:

Well stated, Batir. I would like the ice cream part, too,though. :D


On February, 24, 2007 8:37 PM , Hashmi Hashmi said:

Nas,
Dont tell me, tell the idiots who thought that the monarchy is so insecure and ragile that two insignificants webpages are considered a threat


On February, 25, 2007 10:32 AM , Red Rose said:

I think even the owner of the agreagtor offers public service ,he still has the right to control the quality of the input in the site. Of course unjustified campaign is not accepted at all. Maybe as you said Batir voting to take the decision of removing would be a good idea.


On February, 26, 2007 6:30 PM , Hamzeh N.
from United States said:

You know what the real problem is? That most, not all, Jordanian bloggers equate "Jordan Blogs" with the "Jordanian blogosphere". It was the same with "Jordan Planet". People would use the term "Jordanian blogosphere" and link to Jordan Planet, when in fact, other Jordanian based blogging services contained many more blogs than JP or JB.

The conflict you speak of is between three private parties actually: two blogs, and a privately managed blog aggregator. This blog aggregator is not a public service; it's someone's private project that is made accessible to everyone on the internet. Neither you nor I can tell a guy what to do with their web site. We can only suggest things to them and we can do that in private letters.

Even though I agree using a post on one's blog about the subject could be very effective, I think one post about this subject would have been enough. But for multiple blogs to start talking about this issue multiple times and to start invoking slogans of "free speech" and what have you is a little too much for what this case is worth.

I think this overreaction is natural in our societies, because we are a people who are obsessed with finding democracy and freedom of expression, so we try to shove it down the throat of everyone, even those who have absolutely no obligation to honor it.

People, if you don't like the way an aggregator is run, you are free to build another that is better and that would render the bad one obsolete. But just because governments are obligated to uphold freedom of expression for their citizens doesn't mean that someone providing a free service on his privately owned web site has to under law. At least that's what I know is the case and believe is true.


On February, 27, 2007 12:57 AM , batir
from Jordan said:

Thanks guys for the response and comment.
hamede: I agree with you.
Hashmi: Again I think if the GID have any problem with the blogs they will contact the blogger and not the aggregator since the blogger himslef is the creatorof the content.
Nas: ice cream is not good for someone sick with flu. Can you change it to Mochachino? On my treat.
Kinzi; you are invited as well, we will be privilaged with your presence.
Cute Mona: cute forum. I will check it now.
Red rose: I agree with you and it is good that Khaled and the committee are back on track.
Hamzeh: this is a normal tendency to discuss a topic that we sometimes need a case study to focus about. No harm with multiple posts and blogs.




Add a Comment

<<Home


Comments are not pre-approved. However, any comments including personal insults to the royal family members and insults based on Jordanian-Palestinian divisions will be deleted immediately. This is a platform for civilised dialogue, if you are not up to it go away.