Jordan Watch
An update and analysis of development and reform challenges in Jordan from a social democratic perspective.

Ten required conditions for electoral reform in Jordan

Jordan certainly deserves better than the Parliament that was elected yesterday.  Jordan's rate of human resource development, education, scientific competencies and economic openness needs develop better electoral conditions. Many people have claimed that it was better to boycott the elections than participating. For me I think negativity can never be an option for reform. Participation is essential but the conditions have to be changed to be more inclusive and representative. On the other hand it is the responsibility of the so-called intellectuals, activists and reformers to be engaged in organized political action instead of criticizing the current conditions and spreading frustration all over the place.

 

I think that there are ten special conditions that must be implemented in order to move towards the development of a real political life and electoral reform which will allow reformers and intellectuals to be engaged in the political process.  Without these conditions, any talk of reform can only be jargon and consuming the time and effort.

 
1-changing election law by introducing the ratio of not less than 25% of proportional list of political parties. This can also be done by a mixed system (as proposed by the National Agenda) where a voter has two votes one for the narrow district and one for the whole country.  It was ironic that one of two members of the National Agenda Committee that refused to change the one man vote system did not succeed in retaining his seat in the elections because the circumstances and conditions have changed for him as well.
 
 2- 2-Cancelling the application of one vote in Jordanian universities and educate young people on civic engagement and organizational cross-ethnic interactions to stop tribal battles.
 
.    3- Prohibition of the transfer of any votes between electoral constituencies before at least a year from the date of the elections except for citizens who change their residencies. Many of the new deputies won because of the systematic transfer of votes, which is one kind of direct fraud.
 
4    4-Allowing voting by Jordanians abroad, whose number is estimated at about 500 thousand people because its is their constitutional right, and also because those voters are better able to resist the financial and tribal pressures that determine voting.
 
5    5-Parties should be integrated to only in 5-6 currents that unable to finance an election campaign and put their candidates in parliament on the basis of programme competitio. The current chaos of little ineffective parties will never be able to develop a healthy political life and encouraging citizens to apply to membership. Broad parties should be formed and rooted in all governorates.
 
6
  .6    6-Increasing women's quota to 12 seats, one for each governorate to give way for women in the major districts in Amman to succeed.
 
7  .7-Increasing the number of seats of the parliament by 15 seats which will only be in Amman and Zarqa.  It is unreasonable that there should be two seats only for the fifth and sixth districts despite the high population density and the seats in other Amman districts should increase for better representation of population density.
 
  8-Develop a monitoring mechanism by civil society and media to evaluate the performance of the Parliament with focus on documenting weaknesses to be stopped and enhanced in the future. People need also to be informed about MPs who fail to perform their duties, especially in the parliamentary oversight and legislation and the emphasis on accountability.
 

9    9-Awareness campaign on the level of communities and society to disseminate the fact that the House of Representatives is a place for legislation and monitoring and not for better services by separating the political dimensions from the services dimensions.

      10-Get rid of all the legislation that impose restrictions on civil and political organizations, particularly the Public Gathering Law, which became a sword hanging on the activities of civil society organizations, parties and cultural frameworks which are the appropriate tools for to development of the culture of political development.

 

Without those steps and possibly others, which I may have forgotten any talk about political development is only for local consumption and external propagand. Democracy will require bold reform decisions which make the conditions suitable for democratic participation.  


Bookmark this post: KhabberDel.ici.ousDiggRedditY! MyWebGoogle Bookmarks
(9) comments


Add a Comment

On November, 22, 2007 1:52 PM , Faramel said:

don't you get tired of playing reformer when you went on record attacking and defaming Jordanians who called for reforms?

remember your vicious attack on Abu Odeh who tried to focus attention on the silenced majority? remember Ibn Irsheed and how you and your buddies villified him for raising this issue? how can you pretend to care for reforms when you attack those who want it?

I applaud your brand of courage, Batir. you really don't care that your behavior contradicts your words.


On November, 22, 2007 7:59 PM , batir
from Jordan said:

Faramel thanks for reminding the readers taht I have criticised Abu Odeh and Bani Irshaid. This is an honor for me as both are opportunists who are completely against any reform. Abu Odeh spent 30 years in the government and Royal court and only reformed his bank account. Bani Irshad wants to turn the country into a backyard for Hamas and Iran.
What issue of silenced majority? for God sake the people who Abu Odeh and Bani Irshaid stood for turned out and voted for Hasan safi and Tareq Khouri who both deal with the Americans in Iraq and generate piles of money.


On November, 23, 2007 8:29 AM , masalha1
from Jordan said:

Y'all keep talking about Abo Aodeh as if he is GHANDI or MANDELA, well he is not never has never will, he is just an opportunist and an ungreatful man who was in power for thirty years and did nothing, yes nothing, not for Jordan not for Palestine, tell me one thing he did when he was a Mukhabarat officer? or Press minister? or in the royal court? thats why most of Jordanian's opposition people have no credibility, because most of them came out of the government womb and when they're sent home they start critisizing the system they were part of.
You know damn well he was not talking about the silenced majority of Jordanians he was talking about palestinians living in Jordan as if they appointed him to speak on their behalf, most palestinians don't give a damn about Abo Odah, and those who do they actually don't give a damn about Jordan.


On November, 23, 2007 12:00 PM , Simsim said:

At least Abu Odeh and Iben Irsheed had the courage to speak out when the others cashed in on their silence. who cares if you like them or not or if they are rich or poor. They were the only ones with courage. and in an era where the arab intelligentsia is dominated by scum who go out of their way to show they are scum in the hope of a pay off, these two come out ahead.

"Staunchly conservative tribal areas are over-represented in parliament, with each MP representing 2,000-3,000 voters, compared with more than 90,000 voters per MP in the capital Amman."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middl...ast/ 7105281.stm


On November, 23, 2007 1:33 PM , masalha1
from Jordan said:

Simsim,
What courage?? you call Abo Odah crap courage?? how come he didnt get the courage to speak when he was in the government for 30 years?? how come he made no attempts to defend those silenced majority he is talking about?.
As to Bani Irshaid, the day he and his party put Jordan and not Afganistan or Iraq on his priority list then I will start listening to his rhetoric.


On November, 23, 2007 3:08 PM , Simsim said:

how come Ghandi or MLK did not speak out 5 years earlier, 10 years earlier, 20 years earlier? Who knows and who cares.

the fact is Abu Odeh and Ibn Irsheed did speak out and others did not. It's that simple.

and if "opportunists" like Abu Odeh and Iben Irsheed can speak out, then how come your "good" people are keeping mum? money is too good isn't it. it really boils down to money and perks. so we attack those who embarrass us with their courage.

what a convoluted equation.

i prefer someone you consider an opportunist but one who speaks out and suffers the consequences (salvation) then an opportunist who keeps his mouth shut and keeps cashing in. there is redemption in the sort of humiliation suffered by Ibn Irsheed and Abu Odeh. They have been redeemed by the likes of you and Batir and others who instead of speaking out shut up and colle$$$t

it's a screwed up system when courage becomes opportunism, while the opportunism of complacency is rewarded.


On November, 23, 2007 4:22 PM , batir
from Jordan said:

Simsim the name is Bani Irshaid and not Ibn Rsheed. Do your homework first.


On November, 23, 2007 7:16 PM , masalha1
from Jordan said:

Simsim,
The only money I have ever received from the government is the 19 Jd a month during my two years military service ( ALAM service ), personal insults are not the way to argue your case, we only have less than a handfull of genuine opposition names, which I have a great deal of respect for them, the rest are just looking for lights and trying to make headlines, and Jordan is the last thing on their mind.


On November, 25, 2007 3:19 PM , The Observer
from Jordan said:

Good points. We should really start working on those before the next elections come.




Add a Comment

<<Home


Comments are not pre-approved. However, any comments including personal insults to the royal family members and insults based on Jordanian-Palestinian divisions will be deleted immediately. This is a platform for civilised dialogue, if you are not up to it go away.