Yet this is the same Arab world that produced leading civilisations, world-class universities, and renowned scholars and scientists. Clearly, something has gone seriously astray. As someone from, and directly involved with, this part of the world, I am convinced Arabs are qualified to regain their glorious past. Arabs have two-thirds of "proved oil reserves", and copious sunlight for possible alternative energy. They have their own market, the potential for an Arab Union, and many Arab countries are strategically positioned, geographically and politically. The people have a unique culture of community and family values, and their faith is inclusive and pluralistic. Above all, the Arab world has people with talent and creativity, with nearly half of the population in its youth. These are forces for progress, but without nurturing intrinsic talent and establishing a cogent system of governance the status quo will prevail. In my view, there are four "pillars of change" that would support an imperative historic renaissance for transforming the current state of affairs. First, a new political system must be established with, at its core, a constitution defining the democratic principles of human rights, freedom of speech, and governance through contested elections. A select delegation of honorable intellectuals, respected political personalities, and thoughtful religious scholars, perhaps under the patronage of supreme-court judges, should form a council to debate and chart a new constitution for a final referendum involving the people. The co-existence of religious values in the lives of individuals and secular rules in the governance of the state should be clearly defined. There is no need to fear conflict, as reason and faith are driving forces in western democratic societies and in some Muslim countries such as Turkey and Malaysia. Second, the rule of law must in practice be applied to every individual, independent of caste, faith, or background. Currently, some rules of law are either unenforced or selectively enforced, resulting in demoralising practices. Besides being a prime cause of poor economic growth, poor governance breeds corruption which cripples investment, wastes resources, and diminishes confidence. If rules are applied fairly, people acquire security and faith in their system. Fourth, an overhauling of the Arab media is necessary. Currently, there are numerous satellite TV channels and several so-called media cities generously financed, perhaps much more than research institutions. Yet people are inundated with mind-numbing and propaganda programmes. The conceptually new al-Jazeera has become a very effective news media among millions of Arabs; similar media outlets concerned with cultural, social, and educational events should be established. The primary objective is to stimulate minds and encourage critical thinking for civilised debates and dialogues. Governments should control neither the news nor appointment of editors; quality and appropriateness should be controlled by the judgement of professionals and the wisdom of society in accordance with the rule of law. We Arabs can accomplish the transition to the world of the 21st century, but the people and leaders must embark on a new course. Incremental changes - so-called gradual reforms - are inappropriate for a system that has been ineffective for decades. We should have confidence in ourselves and in global participation, and not blame others for current calamities or use religion for political gains. The responsibility of the individual for self and societal improvement is clearly stated in The Koran: "Indeed! God will not change the good condition of the people as long as they do not change their state of goodness themselves." I appeal to the Arab people to participate in this process of historic change and not to be distracted by the ideologies of the past and conspiracy theories of the future. Being passive creates a state of apathy and legitimises the status quo. I call on intellectuals to focus on the greater good, not just for personal gain. Conscience and integrity are national responsibilities in this critical period of history. I urge the leaders of the Arab world to implement these historical changes and, in so doing, become makers of history. A genuine and peaceful transition to democracy is both legitimate and timely. Before too long the oil will run out and human talent will migrate, but if we commit to "pillars of change", with jihad for modernity and enlightenment, we will realise our rightful place in the future.
| Bookmark this post: | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Add a Comment
from Jordan
said:Mahdi your points are highly valued and valid indeed. What we need is delivery, but have you asked yourself why does Nassrallah deliver politically while Zuweil does not. The main reason is that in popular politics in the Arab World Muslim clerics and religious leaders have the upper superiority in terms of convincing people. Ahmad Zuweil does not have the power of Nasrallah so he cannot deliver. Give Zuweil and some scientistic a 5 years span of leadership in an ordinary Arab country and see what happens. Nassrallahhas the tools of very supportive background and popular belief and that is the most important tool in the Arab World. When Zuweil has a lecture you will find an empty hall. The same hall will be full capacity when Amr Khalid speaks and shouts or Haifa Wahbe dances or nancy Ajram sings. In Iraq, the country with the highest level of education and science in the Arab world the leaders of the streets are Muqtada Sader, Hareth Dhari and Sistani who are all religious people with exclusive ideas that are mostly fundamental.
from Jordan
said:"Ahmad Zuweil does not have the power of Nasrallah so he cannot deliver. "
And this is for a reason. Talk is cheap. Nasrallah earned credibilty the hard way, not because peopel gave it to him. he fought the oppression, lost a son, opened schools for the underclass when no one cared, fought a murderous enemy and did not flinch. YOU EARN TRUST BY ACTIONS NOT BY WORDS. You friends are no where to be found in the slums of the Arab world where the majority of Arabs live. He is no where to be found where there is no camera or micrphone. He is a Tanzeeri haki fadi and those are a dime a dozen.
from Jordan
said:What is your problem Hadi? I am just saying that people like Zuweil who have earned thier reputation by hard work should be given some executive tools in their communities. This guy is brilliant and yet his actions, not words are benefiting the American Community because he did not have a chance in Egypt where a minister's son or a member of the ruling party will take all credit. I am not going for a comparison between Nasrallah and Zuweil because each of them is a creative person in his own area, but Zuweil is a person that should be given a chance to be a prime minister or a minister in the Arab World instead of the corrupt officials we have. Please give the guy the respect he deserves.
from United States
said:Batir, I think Hadi is simply saying that Zuweil practically said nothing new, and on top of that, did nothing new as well.
Whether Zuweil is smart or not, It doesn't matter because nothing revolutionary came out of him.
A Mule will never run like a horse, but it's more robust and hauls ass.
If these "solutions" have been regularly discussed in coffee shops for the past 50 years, something tells me nothing is going to change.
Let us try a different method. How about we try and recognize what caused the Arabs fall from grace, and see if this/these cause(s) are still found today.
from Jordan
said:Just for the record Batir, i like your posts and do visit your blog regularly.
from Jordan
said:the post below is mine ...Hadi Mahdi
Just for the record Batir, i like your posts and do visit your blog regularly.
from United States
said:Salam Batir,
I read the article, and I was happy at first. But the article, as some described it, "cafe wisdom." Zuwail does NOT explain where het got these 4 points from. He doesn't take time to convince us of their importance. Why and how would they lead to a future that we want?
I don't disagree with him, but the article is very weak.
from United States
said:Actually, in a way, this article proves that Scientists are best kept in labs.
At times, smart scientists think that their "intelligence" is enough to delve into social and political issues. That's actually VERY UNTRUE. A lot of reading, thinking, discussion and hardwork is needed to attain a respectable position in social sciences.
You see this phenomenon with Engineers who think they can issue religious fatwas. They don't realise that before starting to use "pure rationalization" one has to attain a minimum base of knowledge. If you don't have this base, you will spiral randomly in air.
from United States
said:One last suggestion:
Batir, you have a deeper understanding of political change in our countries. It'll be gerat if you can expand Zuwail's article and answer the many important questions that Zuwail has omitted (what are we trying to achieve? why is it good? why these 4 points are the root-solution? how are they going to lead us to our goal?)
such an expanded article, supported with statistics, historical examples, and rational structure, would be worthy of praise.
Add a Comment
<<Home














"most intelligent Arab person" ??
I agree with him but what he says is Cafe Wisdome. Sorry, but we hear this all the time and from people who are masters of Tanzeer. but now, only actions can endowe words with credibilty. I have ever read an article for a Munnazzer in years, but I will pay attention to Nasrallah's every word. If you can't deliver, spare us the speeches. We have been hearing them every friday for over 300 years, or since the free fall of Arab civilizaion.