Jordan Watch
An update and analysis of development and reform challenges in Jordan from a social democratic perspective.

Joseph Massad: Another Misguided Arab Academic Political "Expert" in the USA

One of the main phenomena that I always encounter in the Arab political community is the plethora of the "strategic experts" and acadmic researchers in the west, especially in the USA who are convinced that Jordan is engaged in a historical conspiracy against the Palestinians and their aspirations for an independent state.
Some of these experts can easily throw out an argument that Jordan is accused of causing a great deal of damage to the Arab World. The conviction is not supported by evidence nor common sense and seems a part of a political folklore that is prevailing in the Arab World.
Joseph Masad is the associate professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history at Columbia University, the same University that gave the freedom and power to the greatest Arab writer in the USA, the late Edward Said. However, it is almost insulting to see Masad holding a position in such a university that included the great Said.
Joseph Masad was in Amman last summer giving a series of lectures that were celebrated in the national media and political circles. Little is known that this man has a lot of problems in recognising the real position of Jordan and using the common sense in his writing.
I have been told by a trusted friend that was discussing some political arguments with Masad last summer that the so-called political expert was convinced that when Al Qaeda hit Amman in 2005 with that horrible series of bombings in the hotels they were targeting meetings for Mosad agents.
This is not just a lie, but an insult to all the victims of the tragic events. If I was there with Masad I would have taken him to Radisson SAS to show him the hall in which the bomb has been exploded and the very basic fact that this was a wedding hall and there were no other secret meeting rooms adjacent to that hall. In addition I would have taken him to see an aquaintence of mine who is now paralysed because of that terrorist act and to ask him if they had actually invited Mosad agents to the wedding!
Masad wrote recently in Al Ahram weekly accusing Israel, USA, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia of supporting Fateh to organize a coup against the angels of Hamas that is similar to the one organized by the CIA in Chile in 1973 against Allendi, describing Mahmoud Abbas as 'Pinochet" of Palestine.
I honestly have no problem with the waves of accusations by Hamas and Fateh since they have been calling each other bad names while hundreds of Palestinians are being killed and wounded by Israel, but what Masad wrote in his "analysis" regarding Jordan was pathetic.
He wrote "As a possible step to increase its security and military roles in the occupied territories, the Jordanian government recently established a legal committee to review the provisions of Jordan's decision to "disengage" from the West Bank announced on 31 July 1988, effectively suggesting the possibility of a reversal of part or all of these provisions". This is completely and fully flawed. The governemnt has announced that the measures taken were just for a few "humanitarian cases" to assist some families. Moreover, I would like to make Mr Masad feel safe that Jordan will never committ the same mistake again. As a Jordanian I will strongly fight, refuse and condemn any attempt for revoking the disengagement decision.
We want to mind our own business. If Hamas and Fateh people are killing each other why should Jordan interfere? We have been labelled as the "traitors of the Arab World" due to Jordan's annexation of the West bank and we certainly do not want any more association with the internal Palestinian politics.
Let Masad rest assured that the Jordanian people, and not only the governemnt will not allow any retreat from the disengagement decision which was the best political decision taken by Jordan throuout its history!
 


Bookmark this post: KhabberDel.ici.ousDiggRedditY! MyWebGoogle Bookmarks
(13) comments


Add a Comment

On November, 22, 2006 12:55 AM , jordanian
from Jordan said:

Batir, I have no objection on any of the other points, since I don't know much about the subject and your case sounds reasonable.

However, it is unfair (and also illegal) to mention something that you heard from a close friend about something he said, especially on a subject as serious as the bombings in Jordan. It is unfortunate that this points debased your whole argument and made it look like a personal attack instead of one based on raeson like the rest of your arguments.


On November, 22, 2006 9:18 AM , batir
from Jordan said:

Jordanian, I agree with you. The quote from Masad taht was mentioned by my friend cannot be substantiated unless coupled with a tape recorder! Maybe I should not have mentioned this and remained focused on his "open" ideas. Thanks a lot.


On November, 22, 2006 4:36 PM , Khaled
from United States said:

I've been following Massad's work for a while now. All his work is grounded in post colonial theory which was developed by Edward Said. I take a great issue with Edward Said and post colonial theory because of the way in which it can develop a sense of third -worldism. Furthermore, as a historiography, post-colonialism removes agency from native actors, this view of history and social and political development paints locals, Jordanians such as myself in this case, as having zero agency. The dangerous reprecussions of this strain of thought is that it enables both outsiders and local actors to conveniently shift blame to external fotrces regarding a societie's own limitations. This is not just Said but Spivak's "Can the Subaltern speak?" which you should check out.

On a personal note, as a Jordanian studying abroad at a so called "prestigious university" I find cultural studies a bunch of shit. The university I'm at, has a world renowned cultural theory department . I've taken many classes and I am yet to discover the actual value of this sort of study. As a Jordanian, I see the types of thinking employed by post-colonialist thinkers as being completely divorced from the reality. Part of this si due to the fact that the Arab thinkers among them are in the diaspora and represent the very top of social structure, in other words they are the elite of Arab society and then leave their homeland and are unable to rekindle a link.

Furthermore, as someone studying Economics, I find the economic arguments in post colonial theory to be totally and utterly absurd and alot of them would benifit from taking an economics 101 class.

Khaled


On November, 24, 2006 3:21 PM , OmAr
from Jordan said:

I am always disturbed at your persistence on the mistaken use of the word "Jordan" or "we", because it's clear as the sun in the sky that ALL the conspiracy related accusation are directed at THREE People : Abdulla I, Hussein, and Abdullah II... It's not about Jordan, and it's definitely not about Jordanians!

You may have some valid points in your post, nevertheless, it cannot be considered as evidences of the accusations you're carrying at him, I don't think he's exactly like what you're describing as Edward Said, someone that you respect apparently, described one of his works as "A work of genuine brilliance" (http://www.columbia.edu/cu/cup/catalog/data/023112/0231123221.HTM)

Of course, you should be able to realize the amount of disturbance you're creating when you rely on something that starts with "The government has announced.."


On November, 25, 2006 11:25 PM , Batir
from Jordan said:

Khaled thanks for the great insight. I have enjoyed Said's political writing but do not have much clues about his "orientalism" literature, I feel they are too much for me. Thanks a lot for bringing a glimpse of the atmosphere from US academia.
OmAr I do not rely on what the government says but in this particular issue the Jordanian position is clear and I wonder why some politicians and people just refuse to believe it.


On November, 29, 2006 11:13 AM , Azzam said:

Batir, you always like to fish in the muddy waters. you conveniently chose to ignore that palestinains and arabs have issues with the jordanian regimes and NOT with Jordanian people. Stop this disinformation. Jordanian regime IS NOT Jordanian people.

Omar, we should not be surprised that batir is meeting with high profile persons. He does his homework and he is rewarded.


On November, 30, 2006 10:26 PM , Batir
from Jordan said:

My dear Azzam can you plz specify what reward did I presumanbly get so that I can answer your argument?


On December, 03, 2006 7:40 AM , Arab Girl said:

I met one of his relatives on thearabgirl.com, he told me a lot about him.


On December, 20, 2006 5:42 PM , Nasif Masad
from Chile said:

Batir Wardan wrote: "However, it is almost insulting to see Masad holding a position in such a university that included the great Said." In these words I find the same childish blackmail and intimidation that makes us, as Arabs, not able to develop a new society rich of creativity and freedom of speech. Does Mr. Wardan advise Columbia University to take his blackmail seriously? or he expects that someone at that Univesity would read his valuable viewpoint


On December, 20, 2006 5:44 PM , Nasif Masad
from Chile said:

Batir Wardan wrote: "However, it is almost insulting to see Masad holding a position in such a university that included the great Said." In these words I find the same childish blackmail and intimidation that makes us, as Arabs, not able to develop a new society rich of creativity and freedom of speech. Does Mr. Wardan advise Columbia University to take his blackmail seriously? or he expects that someone at that Univesity would read his valuable viewpoint


On December, 20, 2006 5:44 PM , Nasif Masad
from Chile said:

Batir Wardan wrote: "However, it is almost insulting to see Masad holding a position in such a university that included the great Said." In these words I find the same childish blackmail and intimidation that makes us, as Arabs, not able to develop a new society rich of creativity and freedom of speech. Does Mr. Wardan advise Columbia University to take his blackmail seriously? or he expects that someone at that Univesity would read his valuable viewpoint


On December, 22, 2006 6:05 PM , Nasif Masad
from Chile said:

Arabs in their Religiously Oriented Societies can’t tolerate the free description and analysis of behaviour and situations, they are convinced that any description should serve a regime, political party, religion or ideology, while thinkers in the Free Societies apply the scientific method to research approach, their people are aware of the importance of this method. For them the age of sin or intimidation has gone. I hope that the Arab thinkers can adapt this method, and I guess that Dr. Joseph Massad is starting, this way he serves his academic mission and affirms that when it comes to knowledge, the truth is above any interest.


On January, 16, 2007 12:18 PM , F. E. Samara
from United Kingdom said:

This badly argued attack on Professor Massad's work is truly surprising, both for its scurrilousness (whispered rumours from a friend are used as criticism? surely this is childish) as well as the lack of understanding of Massad's work and writings specifically on Jordan. His book "Colonial Effects" is an incredibly sympathetic and sophisticated reading of Jordan's history, and Jordan's right to be seen as a fully modern nation, and it is common knowledge in the US that Jordan is critical to implementing US Middle Eastern policies PRECISELY because of the close way that pro-US policies are pre-emptively applied by Jordanian governments. Many Jordanians who love their country and their King find aspects of this support very difficult to approve, and the frequent changes of government in the country surely show an awareness of this need to "fix" aspects of government to meet popular approval.

I think that the CONTEXT of the Al Ahram article quoted by Mr. Batir should have been the focus of his discussion.

Professor Massad is one of the most sopshisticated intellectuals engaging with Arabic culutre and the Middle East and he deserves critics who are able to challenge and engage him. I for one would love a keen debate about Jordanian nationalism and the country's role in the region (the REAL issue behind the article Mr. Batir's finds problematic). Would it not be better if Mr. Batir's UNDERSTANDING of Professor Massad's writings should come BEFORE he attempts to analyse or criticise? Disappointed, F. E. Samara




Add a Comment

<<Home


Comments are not pre-approved. However, any comments including personal insults to the royal family members and insults based on Jordanian-Palestinian divisions will be deleted immediately. This is a platform for civilised dialogue, if you are not up to it go away.