Jordan Watch
An update and analysis of development and reform challenges in Jordan from a social democratic perspective.

Urbanization and Smart Growth in Amman

We all witness with a lot of concern the profound changes that happen to Amman in terms of high urbanization, congestion and other problems associated with big cities. One of the best Jordanian opinions about this issue are expressed by Dr Mohammad Al-Asad former lecturere at the University of Jordan and the founder and manager of teh highly successful Center for the Study of the Built Environment, a national think tank specialised in sustainable urbanization concepts in Jordan. He currently is an adjunct professor at Carleton University in Ottawa.
 
Last week Dr Al-Asad wrote a very intriguing article in the Jordan Times which I will re-post below, but before that I would like to guide you to the full series of Dr Asad's articles on urbanization which can be found here
 
 
Now here is Dr Asad's latest article
 
Need for 'smart growth’ concept in Amman
 
By Mohammad al-Asad
 
AS AMMAN EXPERIENCES the most dramatic growth spurt in its history, it would be a good idea for the city’s decision-makers and developers to take a close look at the extensive discourse available on the urban planning concept known as “smart growth” (there even is sizeable and highly informative website devoted to it: www.smartgrowth.org). As the name indicates, this concept is not against growth; it accepts growth, but puts forward strategies for harnessing it as a positive force. What smart growth is against is urban sprawl, the cancerous, low-density, chaotic expansion of the city into the adjacent countryside. In addition to resulting in visual blight, urban sprawl overstretches infrastructure services and results in unintegrated and even contradictory land-use patterns.
 
Smart growth acknowledges that cities grow, and that during economic booms they grow at overwhelming rates.  If appropriate steps are taken, that growth does not have to be detrimental to the quality of life and sustainability of the city, but can be a source of positive change. Smart growth emphasises investing in the existing built-up parts of the city, and expanding upon them, rather than spreading horizontally beyond them.  Smart growth stresses pedestrian access and the use of public transportation. It promotes mixed-use zones that bring together residential, office, retail and cultural spaces within proximity to each other. Smart growth calls for preserving open spaces, whether parks, plazas, or even agricultural patches of land, both inside and outside the city, and accommodates growth by increasing densities in already developed areas, thus taking advantage of preexisting infrastructure services and avoiding the disruptions caused by bringing about drastic changes to the character of older neighbourhoods.
 
Smart growth calls for providing a wide range of housing types to meet the demands of diverse residents: Senior citizens, young families, people who work from their homes, those who need subsidized housing… It emphasises allowing existing neighbourhoods to increase the available housing supply through accommodating higher building densities and encouraging infill developments.
 

Smart growth celebrates the vibrancy of the “24-hour” city, where people live, students go to school, and residents frequent shops, restaurants, and cultural facilities without having to travel long distances, and without having to succumb to the domination of the automobile, but through diverse systems of movement that include sidewalks, bike paths, as well as public transportation systems, whether light-rail, buses, or smaller service-cars or vans.

Achieving all of this depends on the involvement of communities in the decision-making processes that determine the character of their neighbourhoods and the directions they are taking. In spite of the difficulties and complexities involved in putting together mechanisms that allow for effective community participation, sidestepping them will lead to dysfunctional neighbourhoods, communities and, by extension, cities.

Smart growth is sensitive to the needs and expectations of the business community. Cities will not advance much if private investors shy away from allocating resources for urban improvement and development.  Investors clearly have obligations towards the communities and societies in which they function.  However, they need to make a profit, and therefore should be able to function within a setting that allows them to do so.

The obligation of the authorities here are two-fold. The first is to provide the necessary infrastructure services, from electricity, water and waste disposal networks to laying out streets and putting in place public transportation systems. Funds to carry this out would be made available from taxes collected, but it also is not uncommon for developers to make significant contributions to the construction of such infrastructure when their projects are to benefit from it directly.

The second responsibility for the authorities is to provide an efficient and transparent environment in which investors may function, as with the revue of permit applications. Such a commitment should apply to all investors, big and small, as well as the connected and the not-so-well connected. Amongst other things, this means that regulations should be clear and there should be no tolerance for arbitrary decisions or for public sector employees who view the exercise of authority through hindrance rather than facilitation.

Growth is a double-edged sword.  In the short term, it will bring economic opportunities that raise the income of considerable segments of the population.  However, in the long run, it may be unsustainable, and some growth spurts may end up as no more than speculative activities and bubbles that burst and consequently bring down in the process many businesses and individuals belonging to both the affluent and limited-income segments of society.  Growth also may result in chaotic and unregulated development that undermines the quality of life in the city through increased pollution, traffic congestion, and over-crowdedness.  Such unregulated growth eventually discourages new investment from coming to the city, and even may prompt residents and investors who can leave the city to do so.

As Amman undergoes this period of unprecedented growth, all efforts need to be made to ensure that such growth is sustainable and that it will improve the quality of life for the population as a whole. Such growth inevitably brings with it opportunities that need to be seized, but also challenges that need to be addressed. However, as Amman undergoes this phenomenal growth, we should keep in mind that it is not on its own, and that it can examine and learn from the wealth of experiences accumulated by so many other cities throughout the world. The results of many of those experiences have been distilled into concepts such as smart growth. The question is whether decision-makers and developers in Amman will learn from the experiences and the mistakes of others, or will Amman end up going through the unfortunate and painful experience of having to learn from its own mistakes?


Bookmark this post: KhabberDel.ici.ousDiggRedditY! MyWebGoogle Bookmarks
(1) comments


Add a Comment

On November, 13, 2006 8:28 AM , Hamzeh N. said:

Great choice of article Batir.

A few weeks ago I thought to myself that someone needed to raise the same issue that Dr. Asad raised regarding whether Amman is going to go the direction of smart growth or end up stuck in the style of urban sprawl.

The whole topic in my mind started when I drove just a few minutes from where I live, and found a very very small town that looked like nothing I have ever seen in the US. The town is called Prospect and it is one of the few examples of what they call "New Urbanism". You can google it and read more information on it. It's a very small neighborhood on the outside perimeter of a bigger city. Each house has its unique image, and identity of its own, unlike the houses of most American suburbs that all look the same. There are no big loans in front of the houses; houses are closer to the streets and these streets between the houses are narrower than most suburbs. The wide streets go around the town and at one point give easy access to the small town center where there is a coffee shop, a barbeque restaurant, and a couple of buildings with office spaces. The idea is that this is a small community where people don't have to drive all the way to Wal Mart to get their groceries, they can walk to the small groceries store (just like we do in Amman today when we go to the dukkaneh). If a city consisted of multiple communities like this one instead of a huge side that had big housing projects that all looked the same, and the other side had the commercial buildings with the Wal Mart, Target, Home Depot and other stores, it would be much better.

To me, the major draw back of urban sprawl was mentioned in the article and that's the need for the automobile to do everything; to move from the residential side of the city to the commercial side. It shouldn't be the case for everything.

This is a good topic to talk about in Jordan right now.




Add a Comment

<<Home


Comments are not pre-approved. However, any comments including personal insults to the royal family members and insults based on Jordanian-Palestinian divisions will be deleted immediately. This is a platform for civilised dialogue, if you are not up to it go away.