| Bookmark this post: | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Add a Comment
from United States
said:Despite the fact that their vote would not have made much difference,I was actually disappoineted with Qatar's choice! As Arabs, we should work together and for each other - espeically when given such chances.
Moey, you didn't read Batir's post, did you? :p ...
People who live in glass houses...
our regime lives in a cracked glass house. So no one in this stupid argument had earned the right to speak of Arab unity and Arab concensus.
Besides, Qatar's vote was not the deciding vote. So why pretend that the issue is about Qatar not voting for a Jordanian candidate. This is all about Al-jazeera.
If Qatar was the tie breaker most Jordanians will understand the anger and I would have even joined the ranks of the totally pissed off jordanians. but Qatar's vote was worthless.
But the real victim of this argument are the Jordanians who work in Qatar whoes livelihoods are threatend by a silly conflict. I think our government should make sacrifices, for a change, for the benefit of its citizens, considering it cannot help them find work in Jordan. fter our jobs overseas.
Considering all of the above, I say we save our energy for a real fight over a real issue.
After all, not one Jordanian was scratched, not one iota of Jordan's soil was compromised.
from United States
said:I think that some damage control at the highest level is in order right now, things are culpable of quickly sliding into uncontrolable slippery slope. No one wants to remember the spector of the Jordanians experience in Kuwait after the first Gulf war, as many of them are still suffering from the post traumatic stress syndrome. Jordan must move on and forget about the vote, taking the dovish position at this point in time may prove to be a much better course than taking the hawkish position, but who am I to say.
Add a Comment
<<Home













from Jordan
what's the main issue about? what did qatar do. .sorry i'm not much into politics